Adults only · Information, not wagering · Set limits and play responsibly

AI overview · What this page shows

Match details with competition, start time and exchange-style back and lay prices where a market is open. Figures move constantly and are published for information only, never as advice or a prediction.

Tennis · WTA · FinalWTA 500clayProjected pairing

Iga Swiatek vs Coco GauffCharleston Open WTA Final: prediction, predicted score & key players

Iga Swiatek

Win probability

64%

vs

Coco Gauff

Win probability

36%

Swiatek 64%36% Gauff
Predicted score
6–4, 7–5

2–0

Start
Order of play TBC
Venue
Charleston
Format
Best of 3

clay

Apr 202605SunFinal

Charleston Open WTA Final on 5 Apr 2026: our projection has Iga Swiatek vs Coco Gauff, with Iga Swiatek the 64% favourite and a predicted score of 6–4, 7–5.

At a glance

AI match overview

AI overview

Iga Swiatek is the projected favourite at 64% over Coco Gauff (36%) in the Charleston Open WTA Final. It is a clear lean, not a lock.

Lean: Iga SwiatekCourt: clayFormat: best of 3Tie-break: 16%

Charleston Open WTA moves into the Final on Sunday 5 April 2026, with play at Charleston. A WTA 500 on green clay, which plays a little quicker than the red clay of Europe.

Our projection has Iga Swiatek vs Coco Gauff as the headline match of the Final. It comes from a projected bracket built on our reference player pool, not from the official draw, so the confirmed pairing can differ. It is the last match of the event, and the winner takes the title.

Iga Swiatek is a heavy-topspin forehand player with elite movement and the clay benchmark. Coco Gauff is an athletic defender with a big serve and a growing attacking game. On slow, high-bouncing clay, our model leans Iga Swiatek, mainly through surface fit.

Match ticket

Match details

Date
Sunday 5 April 2026
Tournament
Charleston Open WTA
Round
Final
Category
WTA 500
Venue
Charleston, USA
Main court
Credit One Stadium, Daniel Island
Surface
clay (slow pace)
Format
Singles, best of three sets
Ranking points
500 ranking points
Tour
WTA tour
Projected pairing
Iga Swiatek vs Coco Gauff (projection, not the official draw)

Pairings are projected. The official draw and any withdrawals decide the real match.

Projected line-up

Charleston Open WTA Final predictions

Projected final pairings from our bracket model, with the headline match first. Percentages are for the first-named player.

  1. Iga SwiatekPOLUSACoco Gauff
    64%36%

Projected title favourite for this event: Iga Swiatek.

These pairings are projections from our reference player pool, not the official draw.

Win probability

Who will win today's match?

We compare Iga Swiatek and Coco Gauff on four factors: fit for clay, serve, return and recent form. The combined lean is Iga Swiatek at 64%.

Model lean

Iga Swiatek

64% to win · 28-point gap

Swiatek 64%36% Gauff

Iga Swiatek is the clear pick because of a clear edge in surface fit. Coco Gauff keeps a 36% chance, mostly through serve and match-day variance.

Projected pairing: this comes from our reference player pool, so treat it as the shape of the round, not a confirmed order of play. The official draw and any withdrawals decide the real match.

Slow, high-bouncing clay conditions favour patient baseliners and return games, which widens the gap between the two players' styles.

Iga SwiatekCoco Gauff
  • 63Surface fitRated on clay37
  • 46ServeFirst-serve weapon and hold games54
  • 54ReturnBreak-point pressure46
  • 50Recent formLevel over recent events50

Impact names

Key players to watch

Four names our model expects to matter in this round on clay: the two headline players and the next-best names from the projected bracket.

  • Poland

    WTA

    Iga Swiatek

    Clay · Topspin

    Impact81%
  • United States

    WTA

    Coco Gauff

    Defence · Athletic

    Impact77%
  • Belarus

    WTA

    Aryna Sabalenka

    Power · Big serve

    Impact78%
  • Italy

    WTA

    Jasmine Paolini

    Clay · Movement

    Impact73%

Names, countries and playing styles are real. Impact scores are a model reference. They are not a confirmed draw or line-up, so check the official order of play close to the match.

Scoreboard model

Predicted score & set markets

Iga Swiatek is projected to beat Coco Gauff 2–0, 6–4, 7–5. The next table shows how the set and games markets line up around that call.

Predicted score

6–4, 7–5

Iga Swiatek to beat Coco Gauff in 2–0

Every figure is an indicative model, not a live price. Sets and games are derived from a best of three sets format on clay.

Set score probability

  • Swiatek 2–035.3%
  • Swiatek 2–128.7%
  • Gauff 2–119.6%
  • Gauff 2–016.4%
  • Total games

    20–26

    Line 23.5. Average 23.1 games.

  • Tie-break

    16%

    About 7% per set.

  • Total aces

    8–12

    Swiatek ~5, Gauff ~5.

  • Match length

    1h 55m–2h 26m

    About 2.5 sets expected.

Model lean for each tennis market
MarketModel leanWhy
Match winnerIga Swiatek 64%clear lean over Coco Gauff (36%).
Set bettingIga Swiatek 2–02–0 for Swiatek carries 35%. A deciding set is 48%.
Total gamesUnder 23.5Model average is 23.1 games, in a range of 20–26.
Games handicapSwiatek −2.5Swiatek is projected to win by about 3 more games than Gauff.
Tie-break in matchNo 84%About 7% per set on clay.
First set winnerSwiatek 59%Gauff takes at least one set 65% of the time.
Total aces8–12Swiatek about 5, Gauff about 5.
Match length1h 55m–2h 26mBased on 2.5 sets at clay pace.

Popular tennis betting markets

The markets followers look at most for this match, with what our model says for each. These are reference figures, not live prices.

  • Match winner

    Back the player or nation you expect to win the match, whatever the score.

    Model lean: Iga Swiatek at 64%.

    How this market works
  • Set betting

    Pick the exact set score of a best of three sets match, such as 2–0.

    Most likely: Swiatek 2–0, then a deciding set at 48%.

    How this market works
  • Total games

    Bet over or under a games line. Close, serve-led matches push the total up.

    Under 23.5 at a 23.1-game average.

    How this market works
  • Games handicap

    Give or take games to level up a mismatch, so the favourite has to win by a margin.

    Swiatek −2.5 sits near the model's margin.

    How this market works
  • Tie-break market

    Predict whether any set reaches 6–6 and needs a tie-break.

    16% for at least one tie-break in the match.

    How this market works
  • Live tennis markets

    Prices move point by point, so first-set and break-of-serve lines can swing quickly.

    Gauff steals a set 65% of the time, which is why live lines matter.

    How this market works

The case for this match

Why bet this match?

  • A clear storyline

    Iga Swiatek carry a clear lean, so the interest is in the score and games markets, where the favourite still has to convert.

  • The court shapes the markets

    Slow, high-bouncing clay. It moves the total games line and the tie-break chance (16%), so surface reading is part of the edge.

  • Depth of markets

    Winner, set score, total games, handicap, tie-break, aces and first-set lines all exist for a WTA 500 final, so you can pick the one that matches what you actually think.

  • Live pricing

    A best of three sets match has many turning points. Break points and set momentum move live prices, and our model shows a 65% chance the underdog takes a set.

For adults 18 and over. Betting can lead to loss, so only use money you can afford to lose.

Fixture guide

About Charleston Open WTA Final

The Charleston Open WTA is a WTA 500 event, worth 500 ranking points to the champion. A WTA 500 on green clay, which plays a little quicker than the red clay of Europe.

The Final is played on clay at Credit One Stadium, Daniel Island. Players arrive after the Semi-finals on 3 Apr 2026, and this is the last fixture listed for the event.

Our schedule lists 3 rounds for this event: Quarter-finals on 1 Apr 2026, Semi-finals on 3 Apr 2026, Final on 5 Apr 2026. Order of play is published by the tournament the day before and can change with weather.

Keep following

Other upcoming tennis matches

Read before you follow

Related guides & blogs

Keep exploring

More from Gold365

Answers

Questions about Swiatek vs Gauff

  1. The Final is listed for Sunday 5 April 2026. Our schedule shows 3 rounds for this event: Quarter-finals on 1 Apr 2026, Semi-finals on 3 Apr 2026, Final on 5 Apr 2026.

  2. Our model leans Iga Swiatek at 64%, with Coco Gauff at 36%. This is a projection built on a reference player pool, not the official draw, and it is not a guarantee of the result.

  3. Iga Swiatek is projected to win 2–0, 6–4, 7–5. Straight sets carry 52% and a deciding set 48%.

  4. The Final is held in Charleston, USA, with the main court at Credit One Stadium, Daniel Island. The surface is clay, which plays slow, so rallies run longer.

  5. Singles matches are best of three sets. It is the last match of the event, and the winner takes the title.

  6. No. Pairings are set by the official draw, which is not part of our schedule data. We show a projected pairing from our reference player pool so you can see the shape of the round. Check the tournament's order of play for the confirmed match.

  7. Iga Swiatek (POL), Coco Gauff (USA), Aryna Sabalenka (BLR), Jasmine Paolini (ITA). These are reference names from our model and not confirmed line-ups.

  8. Common markets are match winner, set betting, total games, games handicap, tie-break, first-set winner and total aces. Prices move live, and our figures here are model references only.

  9. The champion earns 500 ranking points. The Final winner moves a step closer to that total.

Cannot find what you need? Our official WhatsApp desk replies with your ID and a screenshot.

Ask on WhatsApp

Pairings are a projection from our reference player pool and are not the official draw. Percentages, projected scores and impact figures are an indicative model for information only. They are not live prices, not betting advice and not a guarantee of any result. Dates and times can change, so confirm them with the tournament. For adults 18 and over. Play responsibly and set limits.